Genotype-guided diagnostic reassessment after exome sequencing in neuromuscular disorders: experiences with a two-step approach

Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jan;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1111/ene.14033. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Next-generation sequencing has greatly improved the diagnostic success rates for genetic neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). Nevertheless, most patients still remain undiagnosed, and there is a need to maximize the diagnostic yield.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 72 patients with NMDs who underwent exome sequencing (ES), partly followed by genotype-guided diagnostic reassessment and secondary investigations. The diagnostic yields that would have been achieved by appropriately chosen narrow and comprehensive gene panels were also analysed.

Results: The initial diagnostic yield of ES was 30.6% (n = 22/72 patients). In an additional 15.3% of patients (n = 11/72) ES results were of unknown clinical significance. After genotype-guided diagnostic reassessment and complementary investigations, the yield was increased to 37.5% (n = 27/72). Compared to ES, targeted gene panels (<25 kilobases) reached a diagnostic yield of 22.2% (n = 16/72), whereas comprehensive gene panels achieved 34.7% (n = 25/72).

Conclusion: Exome sequencing allows the detection of pathogenic variants missed by (narrowly) targeted gene panel approaches. Diagnostic reassessment after genetic testing further enhances the diagnostic outcomes for NMDs.

Keywords: diagnostic reassessment; diagnostic yield; exome sequencing; gene panels; neuromuscular disorders; next-generation sequencing.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Exome Sequencing / methods
  • Exome*
  • Female
  • Genetic Testing / methods
  • Genotype*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neuromuscular Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Neuromuscular Diseases / genetics
  • Retrospective Studies