Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y.

Abstract

Background: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial.

Methods: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76-1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63-1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40-1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72-1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41-2.52).

Conclusions: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008.

Keywords: Diabetes; Drug-Eluting Stent; Probucol; Sirolimus; Zotarolimus.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiovascular Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Cardiovascular Agents / adverse effects
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / mortality
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / therapy*
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Restenosis / etiology
  • Coronary Restenosis / therapy
  • Coronary Thrombosis / etiology
  • Coronary Thrombosis / therapy
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / diagnostic imaging
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / mortality
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / therapy*
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug-Eluting Stents*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / etiology
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / instrumentation*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / mortality
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Probucol / administration & dosage*
  • Probucol / adverse effects
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Retreatment
  • Risk Factors
  • Sirolimus / administration & dosage
  • Sirolimus / adverse effects
  • Sirolimus / analogs & derivatives*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • zotarolimus
  • Probucol
  • Sirolimus

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00598533