Reliability of Semi-Automated Segmentations in Glioblastoma

Clin Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;27(2):153-161. doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0471-2. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

Abstract

Purpose: In glioblastoma, quantitative volumetric measurements of contrast-enhancing or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense tumor compartments are needed for an objective assessment of therapy response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a semi-automated, region-growing segmentation tool for determining tumor volume in patients with glioblastoma among different users of the software.

Methods: A total of 320 segmentations of tumor-associated FLAIR changes and contrast-enhancing tumor tissue were performed by different raters (neuroradiologists, medical students, and volunteers). All patients underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging including a 3D-FLAIR and a 3D-MPRage sequence. Segmentations were done using a semi-automated, region-growing segmentation tool. Intra- and inter-rater-reliability were addressed by intra-class-correlation (ICC). Root-mean-square error (RMSE) was used to determine the precision error. Dice score was calculated to measure the overlap between segmentations.

Results: Semi-automated segmentation showed a high ICC (> 0.985) for all groups indicating an excellent intra- and inter-rater-reliability. Significant smaller precision errors and higher Dice scores were observed for FLAIR segmentations compared with segmentations of contrast-enhancement. Single rater segmentations showed the lowest RMSE for FLAIR of 3.3 % (MPRage: 8.2 %). Both, single raters and neuroradiologists had the lowest precision error for longitudinal evaluation of FLAIR changes.

Conclusions: Semi-automated volumetry of glioblastoma was reliably performed by all groups of raters, even without neuroradiologic expertise. Interestingly, segmentations of tumor-associated FLAIR changes were more reliable than segmentations of contrast enhancement. In longitudinal evaluations, an experienced rater can detect progressive FLAIR changes of less than 15 % reliably in a quantitative way which could help to detect progressive disease earlier.

Keywords: Brain tumor segmentation; Glioblastoma; Region-growing; Reliability; Semi-automated segmentation; Smartbrush.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Brain Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Brain Neoplasms / pathology
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Female
  • Glioblastoma / diagnostic imaging*
  • Glioblastoma / pathology
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Machine Learning
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity