P53 family members modulate the expression of PRODH, but not PRODH2, via intronic p53 response elements

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e69152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069152. Print 2013.

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 was previously shown to markedly up-regulate the expression of the PRODH gene, encoding the proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) enzyme, which catalyzes the first step in proline degradation. Also PRODH2, which degrades 4-hydroxy-L-proline, a product of protein (e.g. collagen) catabolism, was recently described as a p53 target. Here, we confirmed p53-dependent induction of endogenous PRODH in response to genotoxic damage in cell lines of different histological origin. We established that over-expression of TAp73β or TAp63β is sufficient to induce PRODH expression in p53-null cells and that PRODH expression parallels the modulation of endogenous p73 by genotoxic drugs in several cell lines. The p53, p63, and p73-dependent transcriptional activation was linked to specific intronic response elements (REs), among those predicted by bioinformatics tools and experimentally validated by a yeast-based transactivation assay. p53 occupancy measurements were validated in HCT116 and MCF7 human cell lines. Conversely, PRODH2 was not responsive to p63 nor p73 and, at best, could be considered a weak p53 target. In fact, minimal levels of PRODH2 transcript induction by genotoxic stress was observed exclusively in one of four p53 wild-type cell lines tested. Consistently, all predicted p53 REs in PRODH2 were poor matches to the p53 RE consensus and showed very weak responsiveness, only to p53, in the functional assay. Taken together, our results highlight that PRODH, but not PRODH2, expression is under the control of p53 family members, specifically p53 and p73. This supports a deeper link between proteins of the p53-family and metabolic pathways, as PRODH modulates the balance of proline and glutamate levels and those of their derivative alpha-keto-glutarate (α-KG) under normal and pathological (tumor) conditions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Base Sequence
  • Binding Sites / genetics
  • DNA Damage / genetics
  • HCT116 Cells
  • Humans
  • Introns / genetics*
  • MCF-7 Cells
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Proline Oxidase / genetics
  • Proline Oxidase / metabolism*
  • Protein Binding / genetics
  • Protein Stability
  • RNA, Messenger / genetics
  • RNA, Messenger / metabolism
  • Response Elements / genetics*
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae / metabolism
  • Transcription Factors / metabolism
  • Transcriptional Activation / genetics
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 / genetics*
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 / metabolism
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins / metabolism

Substances

  • RNA, Messenger
  • TP63 protein, human
  • Transcription Factors
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins
  • Proline Oxidase
  • PRODH protein, human

Grants and funding

This work was partially supported by “FAR” (Fondi di Ateneo per la Ricerca) funds to Paola Campomenosi AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, www.airc.it) IG#9086 to Alberto Inga AIRC IG#5506 to Gilberto Fronza. Dr. Raimondi is a PhD student of the PhD course in Molecular and Cellular Biology of University of Insubria, Varese. He received a contribution “Contributo per attività di formazione in biotecnologie” from CIB (Consorzio Interuniversitario Biotecnologie, http://www.cibiotech.it/) for accommodation during his stay at Cibio, TN. Yari Ciribilli is supported by a Marie-Curie-Autonomous-Province-of-Trento (PAT) cofund grant (#40101712). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.