Is there a difference in outcome (long-term recurrence rate) between emergency and elective pilonidal sinus surgery?

Minerva Chir. 2013 Apr;68(2):199-205.

Abstract

Aim: The influence of surgical craftsmanship and decision making on long-term recurrence rate has not been investigated yet.

Methods: A total of 586 patients with surgery for primary pilonidal sinus disease were subjected to a telephone interview 7-25 years after surgery to determine 10- and 20 year recurrence rate using Kaplan Meier Statistics.

Results: Results show that 546 patients had elective surgery showing a recurrence rate of 23.1% (actuarial 10.6-17% after 5-10 years). Forty patients had urgent off-time surgery with crude long-term recurrence rate 30%; actuarial 25.6-28.9% after 5-10 years); P=0.028; logrank. Mind bogglingly, Methylene blue application was dramatically reduced in the urgent group compared to the elective group, although Methylene blue is known to halve recurrence rate.

Conclusion: Surgical craftsmanship quality was identical in elective and urgent pilonidal sinus surgery with comparable long-term recurrence rate. Decision making was markedly biased in urgent off-time pilonidal sinus surgery, counteracting the good long-term recurrence rate enabled by proper surgical craftsmanship.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Abscess / etiology
  • Abscess / surgery
  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Coloring Agents
  • Decision Making
  • Drug Utilization / statistics & numerical data
  • Elective Surgical Procedures*
  • Emergencies*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Intraoperative Care / methods
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Mental Fatigue
  • Methylene Blue
  • Physicians / psychology
  • Pilonidal Sinus / complications
  • Pilonidal Sinus / surgery*
  • Recurrence
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Coloring Agents
  • Methylene Blue