Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Oct;134(10):1080-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.10.1080.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction.

Design: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim.

Setting: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory.

Participants: Four fresh cadaveric heads.

Main outcome measure: Mean target registration error.

Results: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05).

Conclusions: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cadaver
  • Face / anatomy & histology
  • Face / surgery
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Maxilla / anatomy & histology
  • Maxilla / surgery
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative / methods
  • Neuronavigation / instrumentation*
  • Neuronavigation / methods
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Surgery, Oral / instrumentation
  • Surgery, Oral / methods*