Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):688-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802944.

Abstract

Background: Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.

Methods: We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization.

Results: The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P=0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P=0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.008).

Conclusions: In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262054.)

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angina Pectoris / mortality
  • Angina Pectoris / therapy*
  • Angina, Unstable / therapy
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / methods*
  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Clopidogrel
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Hemorrhage / epidemiology
  • Heparin / adverse effects
  • Heparin / therapeutic use*
  • Hirudins / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / epidemiology
  • Peptide Fragments / adverse effects
  • Peptide Fragments / therapeutic use*
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Premedication
  • Recombinant Proteins / adverse effects
  • Recombinant Proteins / therapeutic use
  • Recurrence
  • Risk
  • Stents
  • Thrombosis
  • Ticlopidine / analogs & derivatives
  • Ticlopidine / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Hirudins
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Heparin
  • Clopidogrel
  • Ticlopidine
  • bivalirudin

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00262054