Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others

PLoS Med. 2007 Mar;4(3):e147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040147.

Abstract

The implications for PLoS Medicine and other journals of new research, published in this issue, showing that there are major variations in the reporting quality of systematic reviews.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Review Literature as Topic*